[2026:RJ-JP:22835] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3654/2026 Chetan S/o Premraj, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Khijuri, Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur.) ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain with Mr. Durgesh Kumar Jangid For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, G.A.-cum-AAG Ms. Manju Dave, Addl. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR (VACATION JUDGE) Order 02/06/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 against the order dated 18.02.2026 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Sawai Madhopur in Bail Application No.141/2026 arising out of FIR No.64/2026, registered at Police Station Mantown District Sawai Madhopur for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 112(2), 61(2)(a) of B.N.S., 2023, Section 66-D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act of 2008') and Section 13 of RPGO , 1949 has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel also submits that the allegations levelled against the accused-applicant are for the offences punishable under [2026:RJ-JP:22835] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3654/2026] Sections 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 112(2), 61(2)(a) of B.N.S., 2023, Section 66-D of Act of 2008 and Section 13 of RGPO, 1949 and the same are triable by Judicial Magistrate. Learned counsel further submits that the age of the present accused-applicant is about 19 years. Learned counsel argues that co-accused person, who is a juvenile, has been granted benefit of the bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 30.03.2026 passed in S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 536/2026. 4. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant contends that the accused-applicant was arrested on 14.02.2026 and since then, he is behind the bars. It is submitted that the charge-sheet has already been filed and trial will take long time to conclude. Learned counsel also contends that no other criminal case has been registered against the accused-applicant, therefore, the accused-applicant be granted benefit of bail. 5. Learned G.A.-cum- AAG appearing on behalf of the State vehemently opposes this bail application and submits that the matter pertains to commission of cyber fraud by the accused-ap- plicant and an amount of Rs.1,34,350/- was found to be deposited in the bank account of the present accused-applicant, therefore, he should not be enlarged on bail. 6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record. 7. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, looking to the age and period of custody of the accused-applicant as well as the fact that another juvenile co-accused has already [2026:RJ-JP:22835] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3654/2026] been enlarged on bail by a co-ordinate bench of this Court. The allegations levelled against the accused-applicant are triable by Judicial Magistrate, that the charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take long time to conclude, therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow this bail application filed by the applicant. 9. Consequently, this bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 is allowed. It is ordered that accused-applicant Chetan S/o Premraj, arrested in connection with FIR No.64/2026, registered at Police Station Mantown District Sawai Madhopur shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and two solvent attested sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Applicant shall be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 10. The accused-applicant is also directed to mark his presence in the third week of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned Police Station. SHO of the concerned Police Station shall send such report regarding presence of the accused-applicant, to learned trial Court every month. In case of any breach to the above condition, the State shall be free to move the application for cancellation of bail. 11. Copy of this order also be sent to concerned SHO for compliance. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR), V.J. 29/RACHNA