RAMESH PANDEY AND ANOTHER v. CHANDRIKA ALIAS MUNNA AND 19 OTHERS
A227/13370/2026 · 2026-09-23
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8494 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8494 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13370 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed seeking direction upon Civil Judge (Senior Division), Chandauli to decide the temporary injunction application 6-C filed in Suit No. 711 of 2022 within a time frame fixed by this Court.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that 6-C application filed in Civil Suit No. 711 of 2022 is pending consideration and till date the same has not been decided by the court concerned.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon Civil Judge (Senior Division), Chandauli to decide the temporary injunction application (6-C) filed in Suit No. 711 of 2022, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 24, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prashant Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Ramesh Pandey And Another .....Petitioner(s) Chandrika Alias Munna And 19 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad