[2026:RJ-JP:22899] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3751/2026 Sahitya @ Golu S/o Babulal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Ramsinghpura, Police Station Batoda, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail Gangapur City). ----Accused-applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. D.K. Dixit For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, Addl. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR (VACATION JUDGE) Order 03/06/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant against the order dated 25.02.2026 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge No.1, Gangapur city, District Sawai Madhopur in connection with FIR No. 24/2026 registered at Police Station Batoda District Sawai Madhopur for the offences under Sections 319(2) & 318(4) of BNS, and Section 66D of I.T.(Amendment) Act, 2008, by which the bail application of the accused-applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has falsely been implicated in this matter. Learned counsel further submits that charge sheet has been filed and the accused-applicant was arrested on 19.02.2026 and is behind the bars since his arrest. Learned counsel contends that allegation against the accused-applicant is of committing cyber [2026:RJ-JP:22899] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3751/2026] fraud and earning money by defrauding public at large. Learned counsel further contends that two complaints were registered, one by complainant-Angel and second one by complainant-Muskan on the Cyber Portal 1930, however, both the complainants have denied to record any statement under Section 180 of BNSS and this fact has specifically been mentioned in the charge-sheet. Learned counsel further submits that the age of accused-applicant is 21 years. Learned counsel argues that there is no criminal antecedents against the accused-applicant; that the offences levelled against the accused-applicant are triable by the Magistrate. Learned counsel prays that trial will take long time to conclude, therefore, the accused-applicant be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate has vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that in this case, the allegation against the accused-applicant is of earning about Rs.4-5 lakhs by defrauding innocent people. Therefore, it is prayed that this bail application should not be allowed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the facts that the accused-applicant is behind the bars since 19.02.2026; that the offences levelled against the accused- applicant are triable by the Magistrate; that there is no criminal antecedents against the accused-applicant; that the charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take long time to conclude, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow the bail application filed on behalf of the accused-applicant. [2026:RJ-JP:22899] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3751/2026] 6. Consequently, this bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 is allowed. It is ordered that accused-applicant Sahitya @ Golu S/o Babulal, arrested in FIR No. 24/2026, registered at Police Station Batoda, District Sawai Madhopur shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and two solvent attested sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. Applicant shall be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-applicant is also directed to mark his presence in third week of every month till conclusion of trial, before the concerned Police Station. SHO of the concerned Police Station shall send such report, of the accused-applicant, to learned trial Court every month. In case of any breach of the above condition, the State shall be free to move an application for cancellation of bail. 8. Copy of this order also be sent to the concerned SHO for compliance. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),V.J. LAKSHYA SHARMA/28