Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010007312026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./154/2026 MUKUT BHARALI AND ANR S/O LATE SURJYA BHARALI R/O KHAMAR P.S. PALASHBARI DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM 2: KABINDRA BHARALI S/O LATE SURJYA BHARALI R/O KHAMAR P.S. PALASHBARI DIST. KAMRUP ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A PARAMANIK, P. KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 02.02. 2026 Heard Mr. A. Paramanik, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. This application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 filed by the petitioners, namely (1) Mukut Bharali and (2) Kabindra Bharali, praying for regular bail in connection with Palashbari P.S. Case No. 283/2025 registered under Sections 118(2)/ 103(2) of BNS, 2023. Page No.# 2/2 The case arose out of an ejahar dated 12.11.2025 alleging inter alia that while the informant alongwith her family members went for harvesting the paddy on her own plot of land on 12.11.2025 at about 8.30 a.m., the accused persons assaulted her alongwith her son and family members at the paddy filed. The accused No. 4 assaulted her brother namely Kandarpa Das with rod and the accused No. 5 assaulted her son namely Ujjal Das and accused No. 1 cut her son namely Ranjan Das. As a result of which her son Ranjan Das has died in GMCH. Her nephew namely Guno Mali was assaulted by accused Ratan Barali with a rod. Hence, the case. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted the petitioner No. 1 has spent 88 days behind the custody and the petitioner No. 2 has spent 51 days and considering the length of detention, the prayer for bail may be considered. Case diary is received and perused. On the other hand, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor on perusal of the case diary has submitted that there are sufficient incriminating materials against the present petitioners including the statement of the witnesses. Having regard to the above as well as the gravity of the offences, prayer for bail stands rejected. The bail application is dismissed. Send back the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant