Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 849 (ALL)

PREM RAJ AND 26 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/5503/2026 · 2026-04-19

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 5503 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ petition does not disclose any legal provision in support of the prayer that petitioners who are working for last many years on contract are entitled for regularisation, therefore, prayer to issue mandamus cannot be granted. However, this order will not come in way if respondents formulate any policy to regularize such employees, claim of petitioners may be considered or they can still approach the respondent along with factual and legal averments to ventilate their grievance. 3. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of. April 20, 2026 SB Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Dwivedi, Bindeshwari Prasad, Rohit Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Prem Raj And 26 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad