KISHORE KUMAR MAHTO ALIAS KISHOR KUMAR MAHATO v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./7523/2025 · 2026-01-07
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8489 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8489 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:269 1 A.B.A. No.7523 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
----
A.B.A. No. 7523 of 2025
---- Kishore Kumar Mahto @ Kishor Kumar Mahato, son of late Jaynandan Mahto, age about 40 years, resident of Village Rangamati Kurko, PO Durgapur, PS Kasmar, District Bokaro
.... Petitioner -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner
:- Ms Sneha Kumari, Advocate
For the State
:- Ms Bandana Sinha, Advocate
---- 2/07.01.2026 Heard learned counsels for petitioner and for State.
2.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kasmar PS Case No.76 of 2024, for offence registered under sections 319(2) and 318(4) of BNS, 2023, pending in court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bermo at Tenughat.
3.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner has earlier moved in A.B.A. No.3149 of 2025 which was dismissed as withdrawn. She further submits that thereafter the petitioner has now filed anticipatory bail petition before the learned Sessions Judge and the learned Sessions Judge has been pleased to dismiss the anticipatory bail petition considering that there is no fresh ground. She next submits that the case of the petitioner may kindly be appreciated.
4. Learned State counsel opposes the prayer and submits that
2026:JHHC:269 2 A.B.A. No.7523 of 2025
the learned Sessions Judge has rightly held that in absence of any fresh ground, second anticipatory bail petition has been filed.
5. In course of the proceeding, the Court has enquired from the learned counsel appearing through the Video Conferencing (V.C.) for the petitioner, as to what are the fresh grounds, and she fairly submits that there is no fresh ground and the ground are same which were present when the A.B.A. was withdrawn by the petitioner.
6. In view of above, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to seek regular bail by way of filing proper petition before the learned court concerned.
7. If any regular bail petition is being filed by the petitioner before the learned court, the learned court will decide the same in accordance with law without prejudice to this order.
8. This petition is accordingly disposed of.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 07.01.2026 SI/