Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8488 (BOM)

Proplay Professionals Pvt Ltd v. State of Maharashtra

WP/2906/2026 · 2026-09-11

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

26-WP-2906-2026 (OS).doc Mayur IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2906 OF 2026 Proplay Professionals Pvt Ltd ...Petitioner Versus State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent ... Mr. Devashish Godbole, (through V.C) for the Petitioner. Mr. Rakesh H. Pathak, AGP, for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. ... CORAM : MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, CJ. & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J. DATE : 11th SEPTEMBER, 2026. P.C.: 1. Learned Government Pleader has placed on record the decision dated 13th June, 2026. The same is taken on record and marked as “X” for identification. 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner, fairly submits that, in view of the decision dated 13th June, 2026 on his Representation/Application, he is not pressing the present writ petition. 3. Learned Government Pleader submits that the present writ petition was confined to the relief of seeking a direction to the concerned Authority to decide the application/representation of the 1 MAYUR KONDIRAM ADANE Digitally signed by MAYUR KONDIRAM ADANE Date: 2026.09.13 16:42:01 +0530 26-WP-2906-2026 (OS).doc Petitioner. Since the said application/representation has already been decided vide decision dated 13th June, 2026, which has also been communicated to the Petitioner, no cause of action survives in the present petition. 4. We, however, leave it open to the Petitioner, if aggrieved by the decision dated 13th June 2026, to institute fresh proceedings in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is Disposed of. [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] 2