Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8487 (CAL)

RANAJIT GHOSE v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/1572/2026 · 2026-03-05

Raja Basu Chowdhury

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

07. 05.03.2026. Court No.03. (Pritam) (M/L) WPA 1572 of 2026. Ranajit Ghose & Ors. -Vs.- State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Ritzu Ghosal, Sr. Adv., Mr. Subhajit Mukherjee, Mr. Swakshar Kumar Mondal. .....for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Banerji, Mr. Diptendu Narayan Banerjee. ....for the State. Mr. Saunak Bhattacharya. ......for the municipality. Mr. Joydip Kar, Sr. Adv., Mr. Indranil Roy, Sr. Adv., Mr. Arnab Mukherjee. ....for the respondent no.13. 1. Today, since Mr. Ghosal, the learned senior advocate representing the petitioners would seek leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh on the ground that there are formal defects in the writ petition and since the same is not opposed by the learned advocate representing the respondents, let the writ petition stand dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh on the self-same cause of action, if so advised. (Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)