APHC010170642007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE 18th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 13802 OF 2007 Between: 1. BH. SUBRAHMANYAM, Superintendent (Retd)., Central Nazarat District Court, Vizianagaram. Vizianagaram District. ...Petitioner AND 1. THE DIST AND SESSIONS JUDGE VIZIANAGARAM ANOTHER, vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District. 2. The Registrar Admn, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, preferablyone inthe nature of Writ of Mandamus, declare the actionof the respondents are not permitting the petitioner to encash the Earned Leave to the Extent of 240days at the time of retirement i.e, on 31-07-2005 is as illegal, arbitrary, and un- reasonable and also inviolation of Article of 14, 16 and 21 of Constitutionof India and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to encash the Earned Leave to the extent of 240 days by reconsideringthe 2 representation dated 10-08-2005 and pass such othero further orders as are necessary. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 17313 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to encash the Earned Leave to the extent of 240 days by reconsidering the representation dated 10-08-2005 and pass such other or further order as are necessary. IA NO: 4 OF 2007(WPMP 93127 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 40502 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 2974 order dated 30.07.2008 in Writ Petition No.13802/2007 on the file of the Hon'ble Court and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 9127 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to restore the dismissal order dt. 30.07.2008 in WP.No. 13802 of 2007 on the file of the Hon'ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: C RAJA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: B VASANTHA LAKSHMI The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION No: 13802 OF 2007 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ninala Jayasurya) Though the matter is listed under the caption for dismissal, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, we are constrained to dismiss the writ petition for non prosecution. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J _______________ T.C.D.SEKHAR, J GVK 4 8 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION No. 13802 OF 2007 Dt. 18.08.2026 GVK