Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8486 (RAJ)

RAKESH KUMAR JAT SON OF LATE SHRI ONKAR SINGH v. RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION

CW/9358/2026 · 2026-05-26

Anand Sharma V J

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:22341] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9358/2026 Rakesh Kumar Jat Son Of Late Shri Onkar Singh, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of Sahanwali, Rarah, Tehsil And District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur. 2. Executive Director (Traffic), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur. 3. Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Vaishali Nagar Agar, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nitin Sinsinwar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 26/05/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in identical writ petition filed by the Kulvindra Singh Vs. RSRTC & Ors. in S.B. CWP No. 15367/2022, Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has held that the penalty has wrongly been inflicted upon the employees, whereas generation of revenue is dependent upon series of factors for which the conductors cannot be held responsible. 2. Learned counsel at the outset, submitted that petitioner may be given liberty to file representation before the Competent Authority, who may also be directed to decide the representation [2026:RJ-JP:22341] (2 of 2) [CW-9358/2026] in a time bound manner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 3. In view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition granting liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation before the Competent Authority, which shall consider the representation objectively and shall decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order strictly in accordance with law within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of representation along with certified copy of this order. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J 42/NEERU