HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 8957 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Sri Padmaker Pandey, Learned counsel for the applicant, states that the applicant has been served with a notice under Section 35(3) of the B.N.S.S. and the investigation has been converted to offences which are not punishable with a maximum imprisonment of more than seven years in the event of a conviction. He states that as there is no apprehension of arrest, this application has become infructuous and may be dismissed as such. 2. Dismissed as infructuous. September 23, 2026 Kushal Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Padmaker Pandey, Rakesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Balraj Singh Dedha .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad