SWASTIK DEVELOPERS v. THE BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
WP/3767/2026 · 2026-09-11
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8484 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8484 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Chitra Sonawane. 31-WP-3767-26.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3767 OF 2026 Swastik Developers
.. Petitioners. Vs. The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corp. .. Respondent. ... Mr.Gauraj Shah a/w Shlok Bodas i/by Tejas Shah for the Petitioner. Ms. Shweta Patankar for Respondent/BMC. ...
CORAM : MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, CJ. & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.
DATE : 11th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
P.C. :
1.
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner makes a statement at Bar the entire formalities qua grant of additional FSI is already completed even though the permission is not granted. Statement is accepted. Considering the relief as prayed for, this aspect can be examined and addressed as per the statutory provisions and relevant rules by the Corporation, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within three months of the Petitioner making such Application.
2. In our view, the factual aspects relating to the grievance of the Petitioner can be examined by the Authority itself and a final call be taken within 3 months, from the receipt of the Application by the Petitioner.
3. In the above terms the Writ Petition stands Disposed Of.
[ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] 1 CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Digitally signed by CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Date: 2026.09.13 17:12:43 +0530