Smt Lakkireddy Manjula v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/20856/2026 · 2026-08-16
Subba Reddy Satti
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8483 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8483 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010388822026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE 17th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 20856/2026 Between:
1. SMT LAKKIREDDY MANJULA, W/O MURALI KRISHNA REDDY AGE 51 YEARS NRI R/O H NO 142 RAMALAYAM STREET VELVDAM VILLAGE MYLAVARAM MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT NOW UNDER NTR DISTRICT 521230
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI 522238
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NTR DISTRICT, VIJAYAWADA 520002
3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR AND SETTLEMENT OFFICER, NTR DISTRICT AT VIJAYAWADA 520002
4. THE TAHSILDAR, MYLAVARAM MANDAL NTR DISTRICT 521230
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or writs more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondents in keeping the petitioners land admeasuring Ac 7-78 cents in Sy NO 783/2 situated at Pulluru village , Mylavaram Mandal NTR District from the prohibitory list under Section 22-A of Registration Act though the petitioner land is a patta land and purchased throgh regd sale deed 4929 of 2012 dt 26-7-2012 when her vendors vendor purchased the same through regd sale deed bearing
document no 524 of 1951 dt 5-1-1951 as illegal, arbitrary, high handed and cannot be justified in the eye of law and subversive of Art 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to delete the land of the petitioner from Prohibitory list under Section 22A of Registration Act in the interest of justice and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for deletion of the petitioner’s land admeasuring Ac 7-78 cents in Sy NO 783/2 situated at Pulluru village, Mylavaram Mandal Krishana District now under NTR District from prohibitory list under Section 22-A of Registration Act by considering the report of the 4th respondent forth with in the interest of justice and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAMA MOHAN PALANKI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
ORDER
Impugning the action of 2nd respondent in not deleting an extent of Ac.7.78 cents in S.No.783/2 of Pulluru village, Mylavaram Mandal, NTR District from the prohibitory list of properties under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908, the above writ petition is filed. 2. Today when the matte is taken up for consideration, Sri Divya Teja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents, submitted the endorsement dated 28.05.2026 issued by the 2nd respondent, whereby the request made by the petitioner was rejected. A copy of the endorsement dated 28.05.2026 is handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Page 3 of 3
3. Given the endorsement dated 28.05.2026, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is Closed, giving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the endorsement dated 28.05.2026 before the appropriate forum. No order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI PVD
Whether the order is :
Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No
Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No