Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8483 (ALL)

SMT. HEMLATA GUPTA v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/38299/2026 · 2026-09-22

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 38299 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Rahul Jain, Advocate holding brief of Sri Kuldeep Kumar, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Jagdish Pathak, Advocate for Respondents-2 to 4 and Sri K.M. Asthana, Advocate for Respondent-5. 2. It is alleged that petitioner is getting family pension from two Employees Provident Fund Organizations, therefore, one of the account of family pension is seized. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has explanation for that and she be permitted to file an application before Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Pension), Regional Office, Meerut that why she is taking pension from two Employees Provident Fund Organizations. 4. Learned counsel for respondents submits that in case such an application is filed, a reasoned order will be passed by concerned respondent expeditiously and if explanation is found satisfactory, impugned order will be recalled. 5. In aforesaid circumstances, with aforesaid liberty to petitioner and taking note of fair submission made by learned counsel for respondents, this writ petition is disposed of. September 23, 2026 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kuldeep Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Ajay Singh, Jagdish Pathak, Krishna Mohan Asthana (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Smt. Hemlata Gupta .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad