PREM SHARMA Versus M/S SHIV SHAKTI TYRES CRMPM-522 of 2026 22.05.2026 Present: Mr. Servedaman Rathore, Advocates, for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent. CRMPM-522 of 2026 By way of instant application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, prayer has been made on behalf of the applicant/petitioner for condonation of delay in maintaining the accompanying petition, which is barred by limitation. While putting in appearance on behalf of respondent, Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate, states that he does not intend to file reply to the application and as such, this Court may pass appropriate orders. Having carefully perused the averments contained in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, this Court is convinced and satisfied that delay in maintaining the accompanying petition is neither intentional nor deliberate, rather same has occurred on account of the circumstances, which were completely beyond the control of the applicant/petitioner and as such, delay in filing the petition, which in my considered view has been sufficiently explained, is condoned. The application stands disposed of. Cr. Revision No._____ of 2026 Be registered. Notice. Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of sole respondent. List on 28.07.2026. Record be called for. Cr.MP No.____ of 2026 (CRMPST/2280/2026) Notice in aforesaid terms. Reply, if any, be filed on or before the next date of hearing. In the meantime, substantive sentence imposed by the learned Court below shall remain suspended, subject to applicant/petitioner’s depositing entire compensation amount and furnishing personal bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court within a period of eight weeks. May 22, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge