APHC010051202026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 3265/2026 Between: 1. Sankela Mariyamma, w/o Late Sankela Prasad aged about 48 years, r/o Chinagudaba Village Sy.No.221, Garugubilli mandal. Paravthipuram manyam district-535501 ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by the principal secretary water resources information and management system department secretariat buildings, secretariat amaravathi. Guntur district-522237 velagapudi 2. The District Collector and Magistrate, Parvathipuram Manyam district. 535501 3. The Executive Engineer, Janjhavathy Reservoir Project Parvathipuram, Paravathipuram Manyam District 535501 4. The Deputy Executive Engineer, V.K.M.NTRP canals, sub-division n0.1, parvathipuram, parvathipuram manyam district. 5. The Superintending Engineer, I and CAD, circle bobbilli, Parvathipuram manyam district 535558 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of Respondent N0.2 in not disposing of the Representation Dated.08.12.2025 made by the Petitioner and other farmers vide PRPM 202512085284 wherein and where under requested not to obstruct to reach their green fields and cultivating their farm lands through the bridge across the Jangavathi canal near pipe culverts at two locations on 3R Minor near in Sy.No.1,11,221,230,231,232 of Chinagudaba Revenue Village, and Sy.NO.24 of Pedagudaba Revenue Village, Gurgubilli Mandal, Parvathipuram Manyam District, is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to obstruct the petitioners and other farmers to reach their green fields and cultivating their farm lands through the bridge across the Jangavathi canal near pipe culverts at two locations on 3R Minor near in Sy.No.1,11,221,230,231,232 of Chinagudaba Revenue Village, and Sy.NO.24 of Pedagudaba Revenue Village, Gurgubilli Mandal, Parvathipuram Manyam District, forthwith, pending disposal of the main Writ petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S SYAMSUNDER RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD The Court made the following order: Sri S.Syamsunder Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS