[2026:RJ-JP:22912] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2096/2026 Bhakar S/o Durgaram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Hunavas Kala, Police Station Jaitaran, District Pali, Raj. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Sharma Mr. Naman Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, Dy. G.A. Ms. Manju Dave, Addl. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR (VACATION JUDGE) Order 03/06/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused- applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 against the order dated 20.01.2026 passed by Session Judge, Sawai Madhopur, in connection with FIR No. 250/2025, registered at Police Station Kundera, District Sawai Madhpur, for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2) & 316(2) of B.N.S., 2023, by which the bail application of the accused-applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has falsely been implicated in this matter. Learned counsel further submits that the accused-applicant is an illiterate person and working as labourer. It is further submitted that accused-applicant has not committed any cyber fraud, [2026:RJ-JP:22912] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2096/2026] however, the alleged fraud has been committed by the co-accused persons viz. Hidayat Tulla, Usha, Rakesh and Pappu Ram and while misusing the bank account of the accused-applicant they deposited an amount of Rs. 3,05,355/- in his bank account, as a result of which he has been implicated in this case. Learned counsel contends that charge-sheet has already been filed against the accused-applicant for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(2) & 319(2) of B.N.S., 2023, Section 66-D of I.T. (Amendment) Act, 2008, and all the offences are triable by Magistrate. Learned counsel also contends that the accused- applicant was arrested on 15.01.2026 and since then, he is behind the bars. Learned counsel argues that there is no other criminal antecedents against the applicant-accused. Learned counsel prays that trial will take long time to conclude, therefore, the accused- applicant be enlarged on bail. 3. On the other hand, learned Deputy Government Advocate opposes the bail application. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the facts that the accused-applicant is behind the bars since 15.01.2026; that the offences levelled against the accused- applicant are triable by the Magistrate; that there is no criminal antecedents against the applicant-accused; that the charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take long time to conclude, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow the bail application filed by the accused-applicant. [2026:RJ-JP:22912] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2096/2026] 6. Consequently, this bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 is allowed. It is ordered that accused-applicant Bhakar S/o Durgaram, arrested in FIR No. 250/2025, registered at Police Station Kundera, District Sawai Madhpur shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and two solvent attested sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. Applicant shall be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-applicant is also directed to mark his present in third week of every month till conclusion of trial, before the concerned Police Station. SHO of the concerned Police Station shall send the present report of the accused-applicant to learned trial Court every month. In case of any breach of the above condition, learned counsel for the State shall be free to move an application against the accused-applicant for cancellation of bail before the concerned Judicial Magistrate. 8. Copy of this order also be sent to the concerned SHO for compliance. ASHUTOSH KUMAR,V.J. 21/SHIVAM