Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8476 (GAU)

SMT. DALIMI BALA GARO @ DALIMI GARO v. MAKONI BORO AND 2 ORS.

RSA/58/2026 · 2026-06-18

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010095792026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : RSA/58/2026 SMT. DALIMI BALA GARO @ DALIMI GARO D/O LT. FAKIRA GARO @ POWALI BALA GARO, W/O SRI PABAN AGARWALA, R/O DEORA HOUSING COLONY COMPLEX NO. 7 FLAT B TYPE, BELTOLA, P.O.- KHANAPARA, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN- 781022 VERSUS MAKONI BORO AND 2 ORS. D/O LATE KALIA KACHARI, R/O KAINADHARA, JAWAHAR NAGAR, P.O.- KHANAPARA, GUWAHATI, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN- 781022 2:RAMANI GARO W/O LATE FAKIRA GARO R/O KAINADHARA P.O.- KHANAPARA DIST- KAMRUP ASSAM PIN- 781022 3:SMTI. PUWALI BALA GARO W/O LATE FAKIRA GARO R/O KAINADHARA P.O.- KHANAPARA DIST- KAMRUP ASSAM PIN- 78102 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. R CHOUDHURY, R KHA,MS. B. HAZARIKA,MR. S. BORGOHAIN,MS. P AHMED,MR. M I HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER Date : 19.06.2026 1. Heard Mr. M. I. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner who submits that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties and, therefore, the appellant does not intend to pursue this appeal any further. He submits that the term of settlement which has been agreed between the parties is annexed along with additional affidavit filed by the appellant. 2. The prayer is allowed. 3. This appeal is disposed of on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant