Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8474 (UTT)

BHIM SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/2125/2026 · 2026-07-22

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010122212026 2026:UHC:6207 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2125/2026 Bhim Singh --Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others --Respondents Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Abhilash Nainwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Yogesh Pande, Deputy Advocate General for the State. Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for the caveator. 2. According to petitioner, he filed Revision under Section 11(2) of Excise Act, 1910 before Secretary, Excise on 15.06.2026. 3. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought a direction to the Revisional Authority to take decision on the revision expeditiously. 4. Having regard to the facts of the case, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Revisional Authority to make endeavour to decide the Revision within six weeks from date of presentation of certified copy of this order. UKHC010122212026 2026:UHC:6207 5. It is, however, made clear that order passed by this Court will not be treated as stay of order passed by Excise Commissioner on 10.06.2026. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 22.07.2026 Mahinder/ MAHINDER SINGH Digitally signed by MAHINDER SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=da6212e6e78d94ed3134842bc6a8d6ca168979ca7b8c2f031a92d1a18b089 23c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AB77B7C5B240908B392BE84F5CDD4C2AF35DC4626D305B1BC9EA4 BABA43D2B8F, cn=MAHINDER SINGH Date: 2026.07.22 18:10:49 +05'30'