Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8473 (CHH)

SMT. RAJNI SONI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2037/2026 · 2026-02-24

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:9831 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2037 of 2026 Smt. Rajni Soni W/o Shri Vijay Kumar Soni Aged About 52 Years Assistant Teacher At Govt. Primary School Khondhara, Block Masturi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector Bilaspur Cum Chairmen District Level Yuktiyukt Karan Committee Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director, Education Division Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - District Education Officer Bilaspur, Cum Secretary, District Level Yuktiyukt Karan Committee Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Blok Education Officer Masturi Cum Secretary, Block Level Yuktiyukt Karan Committee Block Masturi District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashwani Shukla, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, P.L. (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PARTH PRATEEM SAHU) Order on Board 25/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that against the transfer and 2 posting of petitioner from Government Primary School, Udangipara, Block-Masturi, District: Bilaspur to Government Primary School, Khondhara, Block:Masturi, petitioner has submitted an application before District Education Officer, who is also the Chairman of District Level Committee, which is pending consideration, therefore, direction be issued to respondent No.4 to take decision on the pending representation at the earliest. 2. Learned State counsel submits that he is having no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner. 3. On due consideration of the submission of learned counsel for parties without entering into merits on the claim of petitioner this petition is disposed of directing respondent No.4 to take decision on the pending representation dated 16.12.2025 in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within further period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. 4. With the aforesaid observations and direction, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) JUDGE Saurabh