Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8468 (AP)

MARRI DURGA PRASAD v. MARRI HARIKA

CRLRC/1015/2019 · 2026-08-13

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010289972019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY, THE 14th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1015/2019 Between: 1. MARRI DURGA PRASAD, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O. VELPURU VILLAGE, SAVALYAPURAM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. MARL HARI BABU, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O. VELPURU VILLAGE, SAVALYAPURAM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. MARRI HARIKA, W/O. DURGA PRASAD, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/O. VELPURU VILLAGE, SAVALYAPURAM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, NOW AT KONDRAMUTLA VILLAGE, IPURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 2. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): RAJA REDDY KONETI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The petitioners are present. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Vinukonda, is also present. 2. It is submitted that C.C.No.174 of 2016 on the file of the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Vinukonda, has ended in acquittal. 3. In view of the above, nothing further survives for consideration. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 14.08.2026 RSI 3 63 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1015 of 2019 Date: 14.08.2026 RSI