[2026:RJ-JP:21335] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5877/2023 M/s Manglam Transport Company, Proprietor Rampal Garu S/o Poosaram, R/o Village Burdi, Tehsil Jayal, District Nagaur. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S.Dhakar-PP Mr. Gaurav Gupta-Asstt.GA. Ms. Neha Goyal JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 20/05/2026 1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned order dated 05.10.2021, passed by the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Kishangarh, Ajmer by which the application submitted by the petitioner under Sections 451 and 457 Cr.P.C. seeking custody of the un-registered vehicle in question Bolero Camper has been rejected. 2. Perusal of the record indicates that the aforesaid un- registered vehicle in question Bolero Camper bearing Chasis No. MA1RY2TBKJ3L99229 and Engine No. TBJ4L85762 was seized by the Police Station Arain, District Ajmer in the FIR No. 78/2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8/15, 8/25 and 8/29 of the NDPS Act. Thereafter, an application under [2026:RJ-JP:21335] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5877/2023] Sections 451 and 457 Cr.P.C was submitted by the petitioner seeking Supurdagi of the aforesaid vehicle in question. 3. The aforesaid application has been rejected by the Court below on the following terms:- (I) The petitioner is not the registered owner of the subject vehicle. (II) The vehicle in question is not ensured. 4. Looking to the fact that the installment of the aforesaid vehicle was not paid by the petitioner and the subject vehicle is involved in the commission of an offence under the NDPS Act, hence the impugned order has been passed. 5. Considering the above factual aspect, it is worthy to note here that the subject vehicle was purchased on loan from the Mahindra Finance Company but the petitioner has not impleaded the Finance Company as party in the instant case. 6. This Court finds no illegality in the impugned order passed by the Court below, which warrants any interference of this Court. 7. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/34