Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8464 (ALL)

PHERU PRASAD v. PRESCRIBED OFFICER LABOUR COURT AND 2 ORS.

WRIC/29538/2014 · 2026-09-22

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29538 of 2014 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. This is a writ petition of the year 2014. None appears on behalf of petitioner. 2. Petitioner has approached this Court to challenge an order passed on an application filed under Section 33-C(2) of U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. 3. The issue was limited only to the payment of interest since an amount of Rs. 31,132/- was paid belatedly. According to petitioner due date was 30.09.2000 whereas it was paid on 03.10.2001. 4. The claim was rejected since it was a disputed fact and it cannot be determined in a proceeding under Section 33-C(2). 5. I have perused the record and is of the opinion that since this writ petition is pending for last more than a decade, therefore, in the interest of justice, it is disposed with that respondent shall pay an amount of Rs. 5000/- to petitioner towards interest. It is made clear that this order is passed in peculiar facts and circumstances of case and it shall not be treated as a precedent. September 23, 2026 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Awadh Narain Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ayank Mishra, C.S.C., Devesh Vikram, Kapil Dev Singh Rathore, Mayank Mishra (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Pheru Prasad .....Petitioner(s) Prescribed Officer Labour Court And 2 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad