Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8462 (KAR)

MR. D SHIVAKUMAR v. MRS. PALLAVI B R

MFA/7427/2025 · 2026-02-11

Jayant Banerji, T M Nadaf

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7427 OF 2025 BETWEEN MR.D.SHIVAKUMAR, S/O DODDAMALLAIAH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/A #6/2, 4TH CROSS, 4TH MAIN, BYRASANDRA, JAYANAGAR, 1ST BLOCK, BENGALURU. …..Appellant s (By Sriyuths. Gowtham Raghunath, Ankitha G Shelke, Harshith S., Niriksha Y.M., Madhura Shree, Rajkumar, Advocates) AND MRS. PALLAVI B.R. W/O D.SHIVAKUMAR, AGED 32 YEARS, R/A # 39/301, 3RD FLOOR, 2ND CROSS, 6TH MAIN, LAKSHMINIVASA, SACHIDANANDA NAGAR, KENGERI SATELLITE TOWN, BENGALURU. …….. Respondent MFA.No.7427/2025 ------------------------- 2 This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S.19(1) of Family Court Act, against the Judgment and Decree dated 09.11.2023 passed in M.C. No.6786/2019 on the file of the II Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru, allowing the petition filed U/S.13(1)(i-a)(i-b)of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the appellant is permitted two weeks and no more time to remove the office objections. Failure to remove the office objections shall result in dismissal of the aforesaid appeal without any further reference to this Court. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Court Order dated.11.02.2026, not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By: BR R By: NR C By: STE