Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8456 (HP)

VISHAL SINGH MINYA AND OTHERS v. VIJAY WARDHAN

COPC/485/2026 · 2026-05-08

Sushil Kukreja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 ( 2026:HHC:15503 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.485 of 2026 Date of Decision: 08.05.2026 ___________________________________________________ Vishal Singh Minya and others ....Petitioners Versus Vishal Wardhan …Respondent ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioners : Mr. Hemant Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Happy Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. He has placed on record communication dated 07.05.2026, alongwith copy of office order dated 25.03.2026, wherein it has been stated that the representations of the petitioners in the instant case have already been decided. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:15503 ) 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. Notice discharged 3. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to assail the consideration order in accordance with law, if they are still aggrieved. The petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) May 08, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)