2026:HHC:18842 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MMO No. 123 of 2026 Reserved on: 21.4.2026 Date of Decision: 21.5.2026. Mohit Nariyal ….Petitioner Versus State of HP & anr. …. Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr Jai Ram Sharma, Advocate. For Respondent No.1-State : Mr Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. For Respondent No.2 : Mr Sahil Dixit, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge The petitioner has filed the present petition for quashing of FIR No. 200 of 2019, dated 19.11.2019, registered at Police Station Indora, District Kangra, H.P., for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 279, 337 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 187 of Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act) and consequential proceedings arising out of the said FIR based on the compromise effected between the parties. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 2026:HHC:18842 2. It has been asserted that the parties have entered into a compromise with the intervention of the relatives and respectable persons of the society. No fruitful purpose would be served by continuing with the proceedings. Hence, the petition. 3. Statement of the informant/victim Jaisi Ram was recorded on 11.3.2026, in which he stated that he had entered into a compromise with the accused voluntarily without any influence from any person, and he had no objection if the FIR is quashed as per the compromise effected between the parties. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the records carefully. 5. The FIR has been registered for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 279, 337 and 338 of the IPC and Section 187 of the MV Act. This Court has already quashed the F.I.R. registered for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 279, 337, and 338 of IPC in Sushant vs State of H.P. 2023 HLJ 531, Vikas Huda vs. State of H.P. 2023 STPL 3009, Kulwidner Singh vs Ankush Kumar 2023 HLR 384 and Nishant vs. State 2022 Suppl. Law Cases 45 based on compromise. This Court has also quashed the F.I.R. registered for the commission of offence punishable under Section 187 of the MV Act, inter alia, in Rajender Thakur Vs. State of 3 2026:HHC:18842 H.P. and others 2022 STPL 10700 HP and Akshay Kumar and others Vs. State of HP and others 2022 STPL 9456 HP. These judgments are binding on this Court. 6. In view of these binding precedents, the present petition is allowed, and the FIR No. 200 of 2019, dated 19.11.2019, registered at Police Station Indora, District Kangra, H.P., for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 279, 337 and 338 of the IPC and Section 187 of the MV Act is ordered to be quashed. Consequent upon the quashing of FIR, criminal proceedings pending/initiated against the petitioner-accused in pursuance thereof are also ordered to be quashed. 7. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also pending miscellaneous applications, if any. 8. Parties are permitted to produce a copy of this judgment, downloaded from the webpage of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, before the authorities concerned, and the said authorities shall not insist on the production of a certified copy, but if required, may verify passing of the order from the Website of the High Court. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 21st May, 2026 (Chander)