HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32948 of 2026 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State of U.P. and perused the record. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant seeking bail in Case Crime No. 546 of 2023, under Sections 409, 120B, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station- Quarsi, District - Aligarh. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present crime. It is submitted that the applicant is not a beneficiary and not committed any crime whatsoever. It is further submitted that Rs. 10 Lacs, which was transferred from account of the informant into the account of the applicant by the bank employee under the conspiracy, has been returned back by the bank authority accepting its responsibility along with interest into the account of the informant namley Manoj Kumar Verma, in proof whereof, a copy has been annexed as Annexure No. 3 of the present bail application. Co- accused of the applicant namely Girishchandra Gupta has already granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 9.1.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 46200 of 2024. Criminal history of the applicant has been explained in para 16 of the instant bail application. Applicant is in jail since 4.12.2025. It is also submitted that there is no apprehension that after being released on bail, applicant may flee from the course of law or may, otherwise, misuse the liberty of bail and the possibility of conclusion of trial in near future is very bleak. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Upendra Kumar Pushkar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amarjeet Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Learned A.G.A. has, however, opposed the prayer for grant of bail, but he has not disputed the above contention made by the learned counsel for the accused-applicant. The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned A.G.A. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, perusing the record, evidence and also considering the nature of allegations, arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail during the pendency of the trial. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is allowed. Let applicant, Amarjeet Singh be released on bail in the aforesaid case on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:- (i). The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii). The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii). The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted. (iv). The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected. (v). The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at BAIL No. 32948 of 2026 2 liberty to cancel the bail. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. September 23, 2026 Brijesh BAIL No. 32948 of 2026 3 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad