161 INCOM IN THE DINESH KU GREATER M CORAM: HO Present: None. MANISHA B 1. There is 2. As per R High Court R raised by the R for the purpose per Registry, objection(s) de case is dismiss objection(s) so 23.04.2026 Amit Sharma COMP-954-2026 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH H KUMAR Versus ER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MAN None. **** HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) here is no representation on behalf of s per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part-A, Volu urt Rules and Orders, the petition on y the Registry is to be taken back by urpose of refiling the same within a p istry, the present case has not bee n(s) despite lapse of aforesaid period ismissed in default, with liberty to fi n(s) so raised by the Registry. Whether speaking/rea Whether reportable:- NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH INCOMP-954-2026 Date of decision : 23.04.2026 ... Petitioner OPMENT AUTHORITY ...Respondent MANISHA BATRA alf of the petitioner. , Volume V of Punjab and Haryana tion on which objections have been ck by the counsel/party, who filed it hin a period of 40 days. However, as ot been taken back for removing period. In view thereof, the present y to file it afresh after removing the (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE ng/reasoned:- Yes/No - Yes/No 2026 2026 dent yana been led it r, as ving esent g the AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.23 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.