SHIVADUTTA NAIK@SIBADATTA NAIK @ SHIVA DUTTA NAIK v. STATE OF ODISHA
CRLMC/1405/2026 · 2026-05-05
S K Panigrahi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8446 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8446 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No. 1405 of 2026
Shivadutta Naik @ Sibadatta Naik @ Shiva Dutta Naik
..…... Petitioner(s) Mr. Sidhartha Das, Adv.
-Versus-
State of Odisha
……. Opposite Party (s) Mr. Raj Bhushan Dash, ASC
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI
ORDER
05.05.2026
Order No.
01.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
3. The Petitioner has filed this CRLMC challenging the order dated 19.04.2023 passed by the learned CJM-cum-J.M.F.C., Cuttack in G.R. Case No.80 of 2015, issuing N.B.W. against him.
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the petitioner was earlier on bail vide order dated 19.10.2016 by this Court. He was regularly attending the court on each date of posting of the case. However, on 19.04.2023, the petitioner could not remain present in court as his conducting counsel did not take any step for his Digitally Signed Signed by: LITARAM MURMU Designation: P.A. Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 06-May-2026 18:45:51 Signature Not Verified
2
attendance due to communication gap. Hence, the learned CJM- cum-J.M.F.C., Cuttack, issued N.B.W against him. He further submits that the Petitioner undertakes that he will cooperate till the end of the trial and appear before the court on each date of posting without fail, failing which, fresh N.B.W shall be issued against him.
5. Learned counsel for the State strongly object the release of the Petitioner on bail.
6. In view of such facts and submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Court is inclined to allow the CRLMC. Accordingly, the order dated 19.04.2023 passed by the learned CJM-cum-J.M.F.C., Cuttack in the aforesaid case, so far it relates to issuance of N.B.W against the petitioner, is hereby quashed.
7. The Petitioner is directed to surrender before the court in seisin over the matter in the aforesaid case and move for bail within a period of fifteen days hence. On such event, the said court shall consider the move of the petitioner to release him on bail on its own merit.
8. Accordingly, the CRLMC is disposed of.
( Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi)
Judge Murmu Designation: P.A.