MAHENDRA KUMAR S/O OMPRAKASH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3223/2026 · 2026-05-27
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8445 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8445 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:22714] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3223/2026 Mahendra Kumar S/o Omprakash, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Harijano Ka Mohalla, Ramgarh, P.s. Ramgarh District Sikar. (Accused Is At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3386/2026 Sabir S/o Saleem, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Ward No. 60, Pipli Chowk, Jhunjhunu, Police Station Kotwali Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankush Sharma Mr. Intjar Ali For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 27/05/2026
1. The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.402/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu for offences under Sections 326(g), 332(b), 351(2), 324(2), 191(2), 190, 111(3) of BNS, 2023.
[2026:RJ-JP:22714] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3223/2026]
2. Since both these bail applications arise out of common FIR, hence, they are being decided by this common order.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. The allegations levelled against the present petitioners are that they committed mischief by fire at the workshop of the complainant Nasir and thereby caused damage to the vehicles parked at the said workshop. The petitioners are in custody since 01.12.2025 without any criminal past. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently, the bail applications deserves to be allowed.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications of the petitioners.
6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submissions made by
learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
7. Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Mahendra Kumar S/o Omprakash and Sabir S/o Saleem, be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with
[2026:RJ-JP:22714] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3223/2026] the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
( PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/9-10