[2026:RJ-JP:22719] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 842/2026 1. Nisha Kumawat D/o Shri Ratan Lal Kumawat W/o Binnu Jangir, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Village Bhatkheda, Police Station Kankroli, Tehsil And District Rajsamand Presently Resident Of Village Chhardara Post Devta, Police Station Paniyala, Tehsil Kotputli, District Kotputli- Behror(Raj.) 2. Binnu Jangir S/o Shri Mool Chand Jangir, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village Chhardara Post Devta, Police Station Paniyala, Tehsil Kotputli, District Kotputli- Behror(Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan Police, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. The Superintendent Of Police, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.). 4. The Superintendent Of Police, District Rajsamand (Raj.). 5. The Nodal Officer, Office Of Superintendent Of Police, Kotputli-Behror, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.). 6. The Nodal Officer, Office Of Superintendent Of Police, Rajsamand, District Rajsamand (Raj.). 7. The Station House Officer, Police Station Paniyala, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.). 8. The Station House Officer, Police Station Kankroli, District Rajsamand (Raj.). 9. Ratan Lal Kumawat S/o Mnagilal Kumawat, R/o Village Bhatkheda, Police Station Kankroli, Tehsil And District Rajsamand (Raj.) (Father Of Petitioner No.1) 10. Bhavesh Kumawat S/o Ratan Lal Kumawat, R/o Village Bhatkheda, Police Station Kankroli, Tehsil And District Rajsamand (Raj.) (Brother Of Petitioner No.1) 11. Shankar Lal S/o Mohan Lal, R/o Village Bhana, Police Station Kankroli, Tehsil And District Rajsamand (Raj.) [2026:RJ-JP:22719] (2 of 3) [CRLW-842/2026] (Maternal Uncle Of Petitioner No.1) 12. Rahul Kumawat S/o Kailash Chandra, R/o Village Nogama, Police Station Kankroli, Tehsil And District Rajsamand (Raj.) (Cousin Brother Of Petitioner No.1) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Dipti Jindal, Adv. Mr. Bhartesh Joshi, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 27/05/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.9 to 12 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners solemnized their marriage on 08.05.2026 at Nagar Arya Samaj Sansthan Bapu Nagar Lal Kothi Tonk Road, Jaipur and same has been registered before the Marriage Registration Officer, Nagar Nigam, Jaipur. A copy of the petitioners’ marriage registration certificate has been annexed with the petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos. 9 to 12 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they have prayed for protection. [2026:RJ-JP:22719] (3 of 3) [CRLW-842/2026] 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the same. 6. Both the petitioners are present in person today in the court. Their signature have been obtained on the court’s order sheet and they have been duly identified by their counsel. 7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are directed to file an appropriate application seeking protection before the concerned SHO, who in turn, is directed that if such an application is filed before him, he will provide adequate protection to the petitioners as per law and ensure that no harm is caused to them. 8. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 9. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 10. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect other civil/ criminal proceedings, if any pending in the present matter. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J Gourav/288