Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8441 (HP)

JAWAHR JISHTU v. ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF JSV AND OTHERS

ARB.C/101/2026 · 2026-05-07

Romesh Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Arbitration Case No. 101 of 2026 Date of decision. 07.04.2026 Jawhar Jishtu Govt. Contractor ...Petitioner. Versus Engineer-in-Chief, JSV and others ...Respondents. Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Additional Advocate General. Romesh Verma, Judge(oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 29(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking extension of time to conclude the arbitration proceedings in Claim Petition No. 804 of 2024 pertaining to Agreement No. 18 of 2019-20, Ani Division, Jal Shakti Vibhag, titled Jawahar Jishtu vs. Engineer-in-Chief, JSV & Others, pending adjudication before the learned Arbitrator, Sh. Jatinder Singh Bhogal, Senior Advocate. 2. It has been averred in the petition that the claimant/petitioner participated in the tender, and pursuant to 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 the negotiations, the work was awarded by the Executive Engineer, J.S.V. Division, Anni, on 22.07.2019. 3. The claimant/petitioner, on account of the dispute that arose between the parties, was constrained to file an arbitration case before this Court for appointment of an arbitrator. This Court, vide order dated 10.04.2024, appointed Sh. Jatinder Singh Bhogal, Senior Advocate, as the sole Arbitrator to resolve the disputes between the parties. 4. As per Section 29A(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the award has to be passed within 12 months from the date of completion of pleadings, however, the said period of 12 months expired, and thereafter the parties continued to participate in the proceedings for a further period of six months, as provided under Section 29A(3) of the Act. 5. Learned counsel for the claimant/petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to the order passed by the learned Arbitrator on 22.04.2026, whereby it has been reflected that arguments in the matter were heard on 08.04.2026 and the award has been reserved. The petitioner has prayed for extension of time for completing the arbitration proceedings in Claim Petition No. 804 of 2024 pertaining to 3 Agreement No. 18 of 2019-20, Anni Division, Jal Shakti Vibhag, titled Jawahar Jishtu vs. Engineer-in-Chief, JSV & Others, pending before the learned Arbitrator, Mr. Jatinder Singh Bhogal, learned Senior Counsel. 6. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection in case present petition is allowed. 7. Consequently, petition stands disposed of. Time for completing the arbitration proceedings is extended and it is directed that the proceedings be completed within a period of three months from today. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Romesh Verma) Judge May 7, 2026 (Nisha)