Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30795 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
1. Heard Sri Brij Raj Singh, learned counsel for the accused-applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the accused-applicant Shivam Singh to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 137 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 352, 131, 109(1), 118(2), 3(5) BNS, P.S.- Rawatpur, District- Kanpur Nagar, during the pendency of trial. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the accused-applicant that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in F.I.R. dated 11.04.2026 lodged belatedly by the informant Shivam Gupta, who is the owner of electrical shop against the five named and ten anonymous persons with the allegation that on 10.04.2026 at about 23:45 hours, the accused persons had assaulted the informant, his friends Vishal and Eshan, when Shivam Gupta has asked for Rs. 22,000/- from accused/applicant for the previous purchase of cooler by him. It is on this issue that the assault has been made. Further submits that Shivam Gupta and Eshan suffered one injury each, which is simple in nature, whereas, the injured Vishal suffered six injuries on his person with a loss of vision of right eye. Further submits that the weapons allegedly used by accused persons is lathi, danda and sariya. Further submits that it was merely an altercation between the parties, which led to the fight. There is no specific role attributed on the accused-applicant. It was not with the intention to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Brij Raj Singh, Piyush Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shivam Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
commit murder. The applicant has criminal history of three cases and in all the cases he is on bail. The charge sheet is submitted. The applicant is in jail since 10.06.2026 and hence, the applicant seeks to be released on bail. 4. Learned A.G.A. for State has opposed the prayer for bail. 5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Considered the number and nature of injuries and implication of nearly 17 persons in the F.I.R.
7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8.
The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685]. 9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 24, 2026 Abhishek Sri. BAIL No. 30795 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK RANJAN SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad