APHC010145472025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1179/2025 Between: 1. SMT V JAMUNA, W/O. NARAYANA, AGE 32 YEARS, OCC-HOUSE WIFE, R/O. KRISHNAGOWNI KOTTALU VILLAGE, PB VADA PANCHAYATH AREA, GUDIPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SRIMANNARAYANAPPA A NARAYANAPPA, S/O. BUSAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC- VILLAGE SARPANCH R/O. CHEEKATIPALLI VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH, GUDIPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 2. G GANGAPPA, S/O. LATE GANTLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O. KOTAPALLI VILLAGE, SONARSANAPALLI POST, CHEEKATIPALLI PANCHAYTH, GUDIPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 3. B SRINIVASULU, S/O. LATE BAJJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC-CULTIVATION, R/O. KOTAPALLI VILLAGE, SONARSANAPALLI POST, CHEEKATIPALLI PANCHAYTH, GUDIPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 4. S VENKATAPATHI, S/O. B SRINIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O. KOTAPALLI VILLAGE, SONARSANAPALLI POST CHEEKATIPALLI PANCHAYTH, GUDIPALLI MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT 5. S SUBRAHMANYAM, S/O. B SRINIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, OCC-CULTIVATION, R/O. KOTAPALLI VILLAGE, SONARSANAPALLI POST, CHEEKATIPALLI PANCHAYTH, 2 GUDIPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 6. G MUNEPPA, S/O. LATE GUNDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC-CULTIVATION, R/O. KOTAPALLI VILLAGE, SONARSANAPALLI POST, CHEEKATIPALLI PANCHAYTH, GUDIPALLI MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT 7. K VENKATESU, S/O. LATE KENCHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC-CULTIVATION R/O. KOTAPALLI VILLAGE, SONARSANAPALLI POST, CHEEKATIPALLI PANCHAYTH, GUDIPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 8. G VENKATA SWAMY, S/O. LATE GUNDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O. KOTAPALLI VILLAGE, SONARSANAPALLI POST, CHEEKATIPALLI PANCHAYTH, GUDIPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the contemnors/respondents under the provisions of contempt of the courts Act for willfully and wontedly violating the orders of this Honble High Court in W.P. No. 30721 Of 2024 dated 30.12.2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioner to implead the proposed respondent No. 2 to 8 as parties/Respondents in C.C. No. of 2025 for disobeying the order dated 30- 12-2024 passed in WP.No.30721 of 2024 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S NAGARAJU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. S NAGARAJU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. K.M.PAVAN KUMAR The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.1179 of 2026 ORDER: No representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. This Court, vide order dated 30.12.2024 in W.P.No.30721 of 2024, directed the respondents to restore the electricity connection to the petitioner. 3. Respondent Nos.2 to 8 filed reply in the contempt case and in paragraph No.13 it is stated that electricity connection is restored to the petitioner and the petitioner is cultivating the land and the respondents are not interfering with the electricity connection in any manner. 4. As the respondents have complied with the orders of this Court, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 12.08.2026 KBN 4 41 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.1179 of 2025 12.08.2026 KKBBNN