SMT. VIDHYA DEVI DAUGHTER OF LATE RAMSWAROOP, WIFE OF PRAHLAD GUPTA v. NAWAB KHAN S/O KHAIRATI KHAN
CW/2557/2026 · 2026-03-10
Bipin Gupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 844 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 844 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:10193] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2557/2026 Smt. Vidhya Devi Daughter Of Late Ramswaroop, Wife Of Prahlad Gupta, Resident Of Vyas Mohalla, Kasida Gali Gangapur City Tehsil Gangapur City Distt. Gangapur City (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner/Non Appellant/Plaintiff Versus Nawab Khan S/o Khairati Khan, Aged About 76 Years, R/o Near By Temple Shri Terah Hazari, Kasida Gali, Vyas Mohalla, Gangapur City Tehsil Gangapur City Distt. Gangapur City. ----Respondent/Appellant/Defendant For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lakshay K Sharma on behalf of Mr. L.L. Gupta For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Judgment/Order 10/03/2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed with an innocuous prayer for a direction that the learned Appellate Court may be
directed to decide the Civil Regular Appeal No.60/2024 in a time bound manner preferably within a period of three months.
2. Heard.
3. This Court finds that the appeal has been filed in the year 2024 only and the Hon'ble Apex Court has held in the case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.; (2024) 6 SCC 267, that in the ordinary course, the Constitutional Court should refrain from fixing a time bound schedule for the disposal of cases pending before any other Court. The relevant paragraph of the judgment reads as under:
[2026:RJ-JP:10193] (2 of 2) [CW-2557/2026]
“47.3 Constitutional Courts, in the ordinary course, should refrain from fixing a time-bound schedule for the disposal of cases pending before any other Courts. Constitutional Courts may issue directions for the time- bound disposal of cases only in exceptional circumstances. The issue of prioritising the disposal of cases should be best left to the decision of the concerned Courts where the cases are pending.”
4. In view of the same, this Court do not deem it appropriate to issue any direction to the learned Appellate Court to decide the matter in a specific time frame. However, it is expected from the learned Appellate Court that the appeal pending before it may be decided in accordance with law.
5. With the above observations, the present Civil Writ Petition stands disposed of.
6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(BIPIN GUPTA),J MAHIMA/13