Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 844 (CAL)

SUNIL RAY @ SUNIL ROY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/4253/2025 · 2026-01-13

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

13/01/2026 D/L – 46 Court No.28 S. Kundu Allowed C.R.M.(A) 4253 of 2025 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Bamongola P.S case no. 34 of 2025 dated 7/3/2025 under sections 115(2)/126(2)/76/351(2)/3(5) of the BNS. In the matter of: Sunil Ray @ Sunil Roy ...Petitioner. Mr. Wasim Akram …for the petitioner. Mr. Imran Ali Mr. Debanshu Ghorai …for the State. 1. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the case has been falsely instituted by the de-facto complainant as the petitioner was unable to secure a suitable match for her. Charge-sheet has been submitted. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He relies on the statements of the victim and the other witnesses and the injury report which does not show infliction of any grievous injury. 3. Considering the above and the other materials available in the case diary and the fact that charge-sheet has been submitted, I do not think that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required in this case and I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2 4. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to further conditions that the petitioner shall not threaten or intimidate the witnesses. The petitioner shall surrender before the jurisdictional Court and pray for bail within four weeks from date and shall regularly attend the jurisdictional Court. The petitioner shall stay outside the jurisdiction of Bamongola Police Station for a period of two months except for meeting the I.O or attending the jurisdictional Court. 5. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is allowed. 6. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with requisite formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)