SANJAY KUMAR PUNDIR v. SUNNY PRATAP @ SANNI PRATAP AND 4 OTHERS
A227/13302/2026 · 2026-09-22
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8439 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8439 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13302 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction upon learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Deoband, Saharanpur to decide 6-C application filed in Civil Suit No. 228 of 2025.
2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the temporary injunction application 6-C filed in Civil Suit No. 228 of 2025 by the next date fixed in the matter or within a period of one month, positively, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties.
3. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 23, 2026 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhananjay Pundir Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Sanjay Kumar Pundir .....Petitioner(s) Sunny Pratap @ Sanni Pratap And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad