Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8438 (CAL)

PARAG KUMAR MITRA v. KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.

WPA/3135/2026 · 2026-04-07

Shampa Dutt Paul

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 1 07.04.2026 Item No.43 Court No. 30 MKP WPA 3135 of 2026 Parag Kumar Mitra -vs- The Kolkata Municipal Corporation And Ors. Mr. Srijib Chakraborty Ms. Rupsa Sreemani ………… for the Petitioner Mr. Sayak Chakraborti Mr. W.Roy Ms. Iswar Dan Mr. S.Chatterjee ……..for the Respondent nos.7&8. Ms.Kakali Pal ……………for the State Debjit Mukherjee Priyanka Jana …………….for KMC 1. The writ application has been preferred praying for direction upon the respondent no.5 to consider the representation dated on 19.01.2026, filed by the petitioner. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for the Kolkata Municipal Corporation submits a copy of a report dated 20.02.2026. The said report be kept with the record. 3. Copy be served upon the parties. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondent nos.7 and 8, the land owners submit that they have 2 2 strictly constructed the building as per sanctioned plan. 4. On hearing the parties, it is directed that the Municipal Authorities shall consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 19.01.2026, on hearing all the parties and stakeholders and decide the same in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned order within 6(six) weeks from the date of the communication of this order. 5. The writ application is to be disposed of. 6. Applications, if any, connected thereto stand disposed of consequently. 7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 8. Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis upon compliance of all formalities. (Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.)