DILIP KUMAR GANTAIT v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
WPA/21900/2025 · 2026-04-07
Bivas Pattanayak
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8436 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8436 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
07.04.2026 Sl. No.38(DL) Ct. No.14 srm IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
W.P.A. No. 21900 of 2025 Dilip Kumar Gantait Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sudipta Maiti
…for the Petitioner. Mr. Sujit Chatterjee …for the State. 1. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. By the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks for direction upon the respondent authorities for disbursement of interest on delayed payment of gratuity and arrear pension from the date following the date of retirement of the petitioner till the date of actual payment @ 18% per annum. 3. The petitioner contends that he was an Assistant Teacher of Dasang Primary School, P.O. Dasang, District-Purba Medinipur, who retired from service on superannuation on 30th June, 2024. The Pension Payment Order was issued on 21st March, 2025. The gratuity and arrear pension was received by the petitioner on 29th April, 2025. However, no interest has been paid to the petitioner. Hence, this writ petition. 4. Mr. Sudipta Maiti, learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that there is delay in disbursement of gratuity and arrear pension and as such the petitioner is entitled
2 to receive interest on the delayed payment of gratuity and arrear pension. 5. Despite service, none appears on behalf of the State. 6. Mr. Sujit Chatterjee, learned Advocate, who usually appears on behalf of the State-respondents is requested to appear in this matter. The appearance of Mr. Sujit Chatterjee be regularised by the competent authority. 7. Let a copy of the writ petition along with its annexure be served upon Mr. Chatterjee, learned Advocate for the State respondents. 8. Mr. Chatterjee, learned Advocate for the State leaves the matter to the discretion of the Court. 9. From the aforesaid contentions made in the writ petition, it is found that the there is considerable delay in disbursement of the gratuity and arrear pension. It is the bounden duty of the State to disburse all the pensionary benefits to the employee forthwith, failing which the employee is entitled to interest on the aforesaid amount. 10.
Accordingly, respondent No.2, the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance and respondent No.3, the Treasury Officer, Tamluk, Purba Medinipur are directed to disburse interest @ 8% per annum on the gratuity and arrear pension in favour of the petitioner by way of pensionary benefits from the date following the date of retirement of the petitioner till the date of actual payment. Such payment is to be made within a period of eight weeks from date of communication of this order. 3
11. Learned advocate for the petitioner is directed to communicate this order to respondent No.2, the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance and respondent No.3, the Treasury Officer, Tamluk, Purba Medinipur, for necessary compliance. 12. With the above direction, the writ petition being WPA 21900 of 2025 stands disposed of. 13. Since no affidavits have been called for, the allegation made in the writ petition is deemed to be not admitted. 14. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 15. All connected applications, if any, stand disposed of. 16. There shall be no order as to costs. 17. Urgent Photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of all necessary legal formalities. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)