Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8434 (KAR)

SMT MEENAKSHI v. SOWMYA

WP/10836/2026 · 2026-04-28

H T Narendra Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23674 WP No. 10836 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10836 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT MEENAKSHI W/O LATE LOKESHA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT KERETHONNUR VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571434. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHRIDHARA K.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SOWMYA D/O SRINIVASA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS 2. KODANDARAMA S/O SRINIVASA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS R/AT KERETHONNUR VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT -571434. 3. SMT. SUSHEELAMMA D/O LATE ALUREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT BYTARAYANAKOPPALU VILLAGE CHINAKURALI HOBLI PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571434. 4. PUTTAMADEGOWDA S/O LATE ALUREGOWDA Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23674 WP No. 10836 of 2026 AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/AT KERETHONNUR VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT- 571434 5. SMT. SAROJAMMA D/O LATE ALUREGOWDA W/O NAGANNA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NEAR MAHAKALESHWARI TEMPLE SHANTINAGARA PANDAVAPURA TOWN AND TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT- 571434. 6. VASANTHAMMA D/O. LATE ALUREGOWDA W/O. RAVI AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS NEAR SAIMANDEER, SHANTHI NAGARA PANDAVAPURA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571434. 7. GOWRAMMA W/O LATE. SRINIVASA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT KERETHONNUR VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571434 8. SMT. SOWBHAGYAMMA W/O LATE NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS R/AT SHANTHINAGARA PANDAVAPURA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT- 571434. 9. RAMEGOWDA S/O CHIKKEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT T.S CHATRA VILLAGE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23674 WP No. 10836 of 2026 KASABA HOBLI, PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT -571434. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 13.02.2026 PASSED IN R.A. NO.22/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC. PANDAVAPURA AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER 1. In this writ petition, the petitioner–defendant No.7 has sought a direction to the Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Pandavapura (hereinafter referred to as the ‘First Appellate Court’ for short) to dispose of I.A.No.I filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and I.A.No.II filed under Order XLI Rule 5(3) of CPC. 2. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein, who are the plaintiffs, filed a suit for partition and separate possession in O.S.No.364/2012. The said suit came to be decreed by the judgment and decree dated 11.06.2018. Being aggrieved by the same, the petitioner herein has filed an - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23674 WP No. 10836 of 2026 appeal in R.A.No.22/2025 before the First Appellate Court, challenging the ex-parte judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.364/2012. Along with the appeal, she has filed I.A.No.I under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and I.A.No.II under Order XLI Rule 5(3) of CPC. The First Appellate Court, by the impugned order, rejected the prayer to consider the said applications. Being aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition has been filed. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the only contesting parties are respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein, who are the plaintiffs before the Trial Court. The other respondents have not contested the suit. Since the plaintiffs have been served, the First Appellate Court can hear I.A.Nos.I and II. Therefore, he seeks a direction to dispose of the said applications. 4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23674 WP No. 10836 of 2026 the writ petition with a direction to the Trial Court to dispose of the applications as expeditiously as possible. 5. Accordingly, the following order is passed: ORDER a) The writ petition is disposed of. b) The First Appellate Court is directed to dispose of I.A.Nos.I and II, in accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible, not later than end of June 2026. c) Parties are directed to co-operate for early disposal of the applications. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE HA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 57