SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010032502026 BA1/327/2026 Aditya Saini Alias Minta --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Ms. Rajni Rangwal, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned AGA for the State. 3. Present applicant “Aditya Saini, son of Rakesh Saini”, is praying for regular bail in reference to FIR dated 13.07.2025 bearing FIR No. 302 of 2025 registered at Police Station – Kashipur, District – Udham Singh Nagar, wherein two persons namely Suraj and Aakash and one unknown person have been implicated for the offences punishable under Section 109, 115 (2), 352 of BNS, 2023. 4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated, which is evident from the fact that applicant is not named in the FIR and investigation has already been concluded and only three persons including the present applicant have been charge sheeted for the offences punishable under Section 109, 115 (2), 352 of BNS, 2023. She further submits that there is only on criminal case pending against the present applicant that too relates to the same incident under Arms Act wherein he has already been enlarged on bail and except this, there is no other criminal case pending against the present applicant. She further submits that injuries of the injured are simple in nature and applicant is languishing in jail since 26.12.2025 and investigation has already been concluded, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation. 5. On the other side, learned State Counsel has not disputed that applicant has no previous criminal antecedents and charge sheet has already been filed and applicant is languishing in jail since 26.12.2025. 6. After hearing the rival submissions of learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that applicant has no previous criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 26.12.2025 and charge sheet has already been filed and there is no need for custodial interrogation, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves for bail. 7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant “Aditya Saini, son of Rakesh Saini” be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties, each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 9. It is made clear that grant of bail to the present applicant will not be treated as a precedent in reference to the other co-accused. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 17.07.2026 SKS