Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8430 (RAJ)

KARISHMA KUMARI W/O PAWAN KUMAR KHOKHAR, D/O VIJAY SINGH, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/841/2026 · 2026-05-27

Bhuwan Goyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:22692] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 841/2026 1. Karishma Kumari W/o Pawan Kumar Khokhar, D/o Vijay Singh, Aged About 22 Years, 3/199, Delhi Bypass Road, Tila No. 3, Kachhi Basti, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2. Pawan Kumar Khokhar S/o. Sh. Chetan Prakash, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Senior Secondary School Ke Saamne, Chauth Ka Barwara, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan - 322702 ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarters, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Nodal Officer, Police Head Quarters, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Superintendent Of Police, Adarsh Nagar, District Jaipur (Raj.) 5. Station House Officer, Police Station Adarsh Nagar, District Jaipur, (Raj.) 6. Station House Officer, Police Station Sawai Madhopur, (Raj.) 7. Vijay Singh S/o Sh. Jogyendra Singh, Resident Of 3/199, Delhi Bypass Road, Tila No. 3, Kachhi Basti, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan 8. Sheela Devi W/o Sh. Vijay Singh, Resident Of 3/199, Delhi Bypass Road, Tila No. 3, Kachhi Basti, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan 9. Anand Singh S/o Sh. Vijay Singh, Resident Of 3/199, Delhi Bypass Road, Tila No. 3, Kachhi Basti, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan 10. Dharmendra Singh S/o Sh. Veer Singh, Resident Of 3/199, Delhi Bypass Road, Tila No. 3, Kachhi Basti, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Respondents [2026:RJ-JP:22692] (2 of 3) [CRLW-841/2026] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishnu Chanwariya, Adv. Mr. Mohit Goyal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 27/05/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.7 to 10 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners solemnized their marriage on 18.05.2026 at Nagar Arya Samaj Sansthan, Bapu Nagar Lal Kothi Tonk Road, Jaipur and same has been registered before the Marriage Registration Officer, Nagar Nigam, Jaipur. A copy of the petitioners’ marriage registration certificate has been annexed with the petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos. 7 to 10 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they have prayed for protection. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the same. [2026:RJ-JP:22692] (3 of 3) [CRLW-841/2026] 6. Both the petitioners are present in person today in the court. Their signature have been obtained on the court’s order sheet and they have been duly identified by their counsel. 7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are directed to file an appropriate application seeking protection before the concerned SHO, who in turn, is directed that if such an application is filed before him, he will provide adequate protection to the petitioners as per law and ensure that no harm is caused to them. 8. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 9. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 10. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect other civil/ criminal proceedings, if any pending in the present matter. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J Gourav/287