SRI SANKARACHARYYA BARUAH v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHRS
WP(C)/3190/2026 · 2026-06-17
Manish Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8430 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8430 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010120642026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3190/2026 SRI SANKARACHARYYA BARUAH SON OF LATE NETRA MOHAN BARUAH,RESIDENT OF P.N.G.B. ROAD, MULIABARI, DIGBOI,P.O./P.S.- DIGBOI, PIN-786171,DISTRICT-TINSUKIA, ASSAM. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHRS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS, NEW DELHI.
2:THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD A GOVT OF INDIA ENTERPRISE REGISTERED OFFICE AT G-9 ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG BANDRA EAST MUMBAI400051.
3:THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED ASSAM OIL DIVISION DIGBOI REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER DIGBOI DISTRICTTINSUKIA ASSAM.
4:THE ESTATE OFFICER AND DGM ADMIN WELFARE UNDER THE PUBLIC PREMISES
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION OF INDIA ASSAM OIL DIVISION DIGBOI.
Page No.# 2/2 5:MR PABITRA KUMAR DEWRI ESTATE OFFICER UNDER PUBLIC PREMISES EVICTION OF UNAUTHORISED OCCUPANTS ACT 1971-CUM-DGM ADMIN WELFARE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. ASSAM OIL DIVISION DIGBOI.
6:THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY US 9 OF THE PUBLIC PREMISES EVICTION OF UNAUTHORISED OCCUPANTS DISTRICT JUDGE TINSUKIA ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. H. BURAGOHAIN, MR. C AGARWAL,MS. H BORAH,MS A DEVI,M BURAGOHAIN,MR Z MUKIT,MR. A SATTAR Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR. W RAHMAN,MR. LENTSO,MR. K KALITA,MR. A SARMA,FOR CAVEATOR,SC, I O C
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER 18.06.2026
Mr. H. Buragohain, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition in order to avail appropriate remedy. Mr. S.S. Roy, learned Central Government Counsel [CGC] for the respondent no. 1 and Mr. K. Kalita, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2, 3 & 4 are present. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Buragohain, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant