Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8429 (KAR)

SMT. RUDRAMMA v. SRI. KAREGOWDAPPA

RFA/1959/2012 · 2026-02-24

Jayant Banerji, T M Nadaf

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11353-DB RFA No. 1959 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1959 OF 2012 (PAR) BETWEEN: SMT. RUDRAMMA SINCE DEAD BY LR’S 1. SMT. DEVEERAMMA W/O BASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O JIGALI VILLAGE, HARIHAR TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT. 2. SMT. SHANTHAMMA, W/O VIRUPAKSHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O BHANUVALI VILLAGE, HARIHAR TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT. 3. RAJU S/O SHIVALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, 4. MANJUNATHA S/O SHIVALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, Digitally signed by KAVYA G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11353-DB RFA No. 1959 of 2012 5. KUMAR S/O SHIVALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, APPELLANTS 3 TO 5 ARE R/AT: G. BEVINAHALLI VILLAGE, HARIHAR TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT …APPELLANTS (BY MS. DEEPASHREE, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. KAREGOWDAPPA S/O BASAVANAGOWDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, MUDAHAHALLI VILLAGE, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. P.B.AJIT., ADVOCATE) THIS RFA IS FILED U/S 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 24.07.2012 PASSED IN O.S.NO.11/2010 ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, DAVANGERE, DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11353-DB RFA No. 1959 of 2012 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI) Despite the matter being called out twice, no one appears for the appellants. It appears that a memo reporting death of the sole respondent was filed by the learned counsel for the respondent on 18.01.2025. No steps have been taken by the appellants. The appeal therefore abates against the respondent. The record is consigned. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE KG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28