Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8429 (JHR)

M/S ALPHA ENGINEERS, BHUBANESWAR REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, PRADIPTA KISHORE MOHANTY v. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY STEEL, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI

WPC/1669/2026 · 2026-03-19

Rajesh Shankar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7642-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 1669 of 2026 M/S Alpha Engineers, Bhubaneswar represented by its Proprietor, Pradipta Kishore Mohanty, aged about 67 years, S/o Late Braja Kishore Mohanty, residing at 921, Nigamananda Nagar, Lane 3, Canal Road, Bomikhal, PS Mancheswar, Bhubaneswar-751010, Dist. Khordha, Odisha (Aadhaar No. 9396 2156 4912, Mob.: 7008565637, email ID: pradiptkmohanty@gmail.com). ... Petitioner Versus 1/ Union of India, represented by the Secretary Steel, Govt. of India, New Delhi, Udyog Bhavan, Dr Maulana Azad Road, P.O. - Central Secretariat, P.S - Tilak Marg, C.T- New Delhi 2/ Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL), represented by its Chairman, New Delhi, Ispat Bhawan, C.G.O. Complex, PO - Pragati Vihar, P.S. Pragati Vihar, C.T-New Delhi 3/ Bokaro Steel Ltd. (BSL), represented by its Director-in-Charge, Ispat Bhawan, Bokaro Steel City - 827001, P.O. B.S. City, P.S - Bokaro Steel City, Dist. Bokaro, Jharkhand ... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Naveen Kumar Jaiswal, Advocate. For Resp. No. 1 : Mr. Prashant Vidyarthy, Sr. Panel Counsel (UOI) Mr. Romit Kumar, Advocate. For the Resp. Nos. 2 & 3 : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate. Mr. Ankit Vishal, Advocate. --------- 02/Dated: 19.03.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions and given the fact that the petitioner has already filed the Arbitration Application (Filing) No. 2098 of 2026 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes that have arisen between the parties, seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to pursue the alternate remedy of resort to arbitration or any other ordinary civil remedy. 3. By keeping open all contentions of all parties, including the objections of the respondents, we allow the withdrawal of this petition with liberty to pursue the alternative remedies. 2026:JHHC:7642-DB 2 4. All contentions of all parties are explicitly left open but we have not adjudicated upon any of the issues raised. 5 This petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty in the above terms. No costs. (M. S. Sonak, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) 19.03.2026 N.A.F.R. APK/VK Uploaded on 20.03.2026