. . HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 38410 of 2026 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. The petitioner has challenged orders dated 23.08.2024 and 06.01.2026. By the order dated 23.08.2024, first appeal filed under Section 67 (5) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 was dismissed for want of prosecution and by order dated 06.01.2026, his restoration was also dismissed for want of prosecution. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a second restoration application has been moved on 16.06.2026 and the officer has orally told the petitioner's counsel that second restoration application is not maintainable. 3. The Court has perused the said application wherein also, prayer has been made not to recall the order dated 06.01.2026 but to recall the order dated 23.08.2024. 4. In view of the above fact situation, even if the officer has orally informed the petitioner's counsel, as indicated hereinbefore, the opinion formed by him cannot be faulted. 5. Nevertheless, it is open for the petitioner to seek recall of the order dated 06.01.2026, for which purpose, he may move appropriate Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjai Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Kumar Gupta Manauvar Ali .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and 3 others .....Respondent(s) application along with delay condonation application. 6. This petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file appropriate applications, which if filed, shall be registered and shall be considered on their own merits. September 23, 2026 Jyotsana WRIC No. 38410 of 2026 2 (Kshitij Shailendra,J.) Digitally signed by :- JYOTSANA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad