Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8426 (ALL)

DHRUV RAJAN v. LAXMI SHARMA

A227/13400/2026 · 2026-09-23

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13400 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "1. Pass appropriate order and direct the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Mainpuri to decide Suit filed by the petitioner bearing Case No. 127 of 2025 (Druv Rajan Vs. Laxmi Sharma) Under section 17 & 25 of Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 expeditiously in time period fixed by Hon'ble Court by hearing of day today basis." 2. It is contended that a case under Section 17 read with Section 25 of Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 registered as Case No.127 of 2025 is pending consideration before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Mainpuri. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expediting the said case. 2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to sole respondent, with a direction upon Court concerned to decide the Case No.127 of 2025, under Section 17 read with Section 25 of Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 3. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. September 24, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajneesh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Dhruv Rajan .....Petitioner(s) Laxmi Sharma .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad