Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8425 (AP)

UJJI KISHORE BABJI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLRC/36/2020 · 2026-08-17

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010091172019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY, THE 18th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 36/2020 Between: 1. UJJI KISHORE BABJI, S/ O. BHASKARA SATYA VARA PRASAD, HINDU, AGED 57 YEARS, RESIDENT OF KASPA STREET, KASIMKOTA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. UJJI BHASKARA SATYA VARA PRASAD, S/O. BABURAO, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDENT OF KASPA STREET, KASIMKOTA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, VISAKAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI 2. BHARANIKANA APPALANARASAMMA DIED, DIED 3. BHARANIKANA NARASIMHA MURTHY, S/O LATE APPARAO, AGED 66 YEARS, HINDU, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.5-2-58, LAKSHMIDEVIPETA, ANAKAPALLE POST AND MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. BHARANIKANA SAMBASIVARAO BABJI, , S/O. LATE APPARAO, AGED 59 YEARS, HINDU, RESIDING NEAR JAYARAM POULTRY, GALI BHEEMAVARAM VILLAGE, SABBAVARAM MANDAL, VISKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. BHARANIKANA RAMAKRISHNA, S/ O. LATE APPARAO, AGED 55 YEARS, HINDU, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.5-2-58, 2 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.36 of 2020 Dated 18.08.2026 LAKSHMIDEVIPETA, ANAKAPALLE POST AND MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. BHARANIKANA PADMA, W/O. LATE BHANOJIRAO, AGED 43 YEARS, HINDU, HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.13- 54, MADHURANAGAR, THUMMAPALA IN ANAKAPALLE POST AND MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 7. BHARANIKANA MOUNICA, D/ O. LATE BHANOJIRAO, AGED 24 YEARS, HINDU, HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.13- 54, MADHURANAGAR, THUM RNAPALA IN ANAKAPALLE POST AND MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 8. BHARA AIKANA SAIBABU SAI, S/ O. LATE BHANOJIRAO, AGED 21 YEARS, HINDU, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.13-54, MADHURANAGAR, THUMMAPALA IN ANAKAPALLE POST AND R SANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MADHAVI PRIYA MANTENA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T V SRI DEVI 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Smt. Madhavi Priya Mantena, the learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the Criminal Revision Case has become infructuous. 2. In view of the above, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.36 of 2020 Dated 18.08.2026 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ Dr.Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J. Date: 18.08.2026 KMS 4 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.36 of 2020 Dated 18.08.2026 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 36/2020 Date: 18.08.2026 KMS 101