Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8420 (JHR)

EXPRESS RESIDENCY PRIVATE LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR RAHUL MAROO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS PR SECRETARY REVENUE AND LAND REFORMS DEPTT

WPC/103/2022 · 2026-01-12

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:634 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.103 of 2022 EXPRESS RESIDENCY PRIVATE LTD. (A company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956), having its registered Office at 55. Baralal Street, Upper Bazar, P.O. -G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi (Jharkhand), PIN 834 001; through its Director Rahul Maroo, aged about 38 years, son of Shri Ajay Maroo, resident of 55. Baralal Street, Upper Bazar, P.O. -G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi (Jharkhand), PIN 834 001. …… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand,through its Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, having its office at Jharkhand Mantralaya (Project Building), P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, District Ranchi (Jharkhand), PIN 834 004. 2. Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, having its office at District Collectorate, Ranchi, P.O. - G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi (Jharkhand) PIN 834001. 3. Additional Collector, Ranchi,having its office at District Collectorate, Ranchi, P.O.-G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi (Jharkhand) PIN 834001. 4. Circle Officer, Town Circle, Ranchi,having its office at District Collectorate, Ranchi, P.O.-G.P.O.,P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi (Jharkhand) PIN 834001. …... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate Ms. Shruti Shekhar, Advocate Ms. Sanya Kumari, Advocate For the Resp-State : Mr. Sahbaj Akhtar, A.C to AAG -III --------- 05/Dated: 12 th January, 2026 1. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the present writ petition has become infructuous and he has instruction from the client not to pursue the present writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the State has raised no objection. 3. Accordingly the present writ petition is, hereby, dismissed as infructuous. 4. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 12th January, 2026 Ravi-Chandan/- Uploaded on 13.01.2026