HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4868 of 2026 Court No. - 78 HON'BLE SUBHASH CHANDRA SHARMA, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The present application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to allow this application and direct the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-15 Allahabad/Prayagraj to conclude the trial in S.T. No. 946 2021 (State Vs. Sangita), arising out of Case Crime No.374 of 2019, u/s 302 of IPC P.S. Koraon, District Allahabad, expeditiously within stipulated period. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that she is accused in the aforesaid case in which trial is going on from the year 2021 under Section 302 I.P.C. and has not been concluded till now, therefore, request to direct the learned trial court to proceed with the case and decide the case expeditiously within a stipulated period of time. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer as aforesaid and contended that the trial is going on and prosecution witnesses are being examined before the learned court. There is no any laxity or reluctance on the part of learned trial court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by learned counsel for applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perusal of record, the order sheet of the case, it appears that in this case for assuring attendance of prosecution witnesses the learned trial court has issued N.B.W. for the witnesses which shows that the learned trial court itself is vigilant about the proceedings of the case. In view of large number of cases pending before the learned trial court it cannot be directed to decide the case within a stipulated period of time unless there are exceptional circumstances those are lacking in the present case. However, it is expedient to direct the learned trial court to proceed with the case, as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary or long Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sangita .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) adjournments to either of the parties whether it is prosecution or the accused, if there is no other legal impediment. With the aforesaid directions, the present application under Section 529 B.N.S.S. stands disposed of finally. September 23, 2026 Suraj Srivastav NA529 No. 4868 of 2026 2 (Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SURAJ SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad